Compaq iPAQ Pocket PC h3600 Specifications Page 34

  • Download
  • Add to my manuals
  • Print
  • Page
    / 38
  • Table of contents
  • BOOKMARKS
  • Rated. / 5. Based on customer reviews
Page view 33
Micke Gunnarsson 2001-07-19
E-post: [email protected]h.se
7 Conclusions
Before this report I’d never really used a PocketPC device. I have watched other
people in my surroundings playing games with it on lectures at school or repeatedly
taping the display with their pencils while travelling on the subway. I have been using
a PalmV for almost two years (in a similar way) and I’ve been using personal
computers in general (mostly Windows OS) for about five years. My opinion on
PocketPC was before this report based on what I’ve heard from other people and by
comparing that to the way I used my Palm PDA.
The first thing that I reflected upon when I started using the iPAQ was the size and
the possibility to carry the device with me at all time like I’ve been doing with my
Palm. In comparison to the Palm the iPAQ is a bit larger and heavier. I think that the
Palm is easier to carry in a jacket pocket and to take out for a quick look for a
telephone number or some notes made before leaving home. The iPAQ is (when it
comes to sizes) more like a classic agenda, which is more likely to fit in a bag, and
the Palm is more like a small calendar that one can put in a pocket. Another thing that
speaks to the Palms advantage is off course the battery lifetime. I recharge my Palm
twice a month whilst the iPAQ needs recharging every second day on average. A
third thing that made me suspicious to the functionality was the “windows-often-
crashes reputation. The PalmOS environment had seemed very stable to me because
I’ve almost never had any problems with my Palm freezing or crashing and I’ve been
using a large number of different applications on it.
At first I found it a bit difficult to find as well downloadable software as information
on the PocketPC environment in general. Palm has been around for quite a while now
and there is huge support for it on the web. The iPAQ is a new device with a new
version of Windows CE and a new CPU (StrongArm). But after using the iPAQ a
couple of weeks I have to admit that there is a lot to be found on the web. I don’t
know if it was me getting more experienced on finding the right web pages or the
constant increasing of support for the iPAQ. The first days that I looked for software I
experienced that most programs available only worked on the Windows CE 2.0 and
not on PocketPC but the iPAQ popularity has grown very fast. Even in the short time
that I’ve worked with it I’ve noticed a growth on iPAQ based web pages in areas like
software, discussion forums, accessories and software development.
After been using the iPAQ for a while I’ve come to the conclusion that the iPAQ well
covers the functionality of a PalmOS device. Of course there is still the issue about
weight and battery lifetime and if one only wants an electronic version of a calendar
and a database of contacts the Palm might still be a better solution. To decide whether
one should use a PalmOS or a PocketPC driven device (or a PDA at all) one must
take a deeper look into what functionality one needs as a user and ask oneself for
example the following questions:
Do I for example want to use the iPAQ as my only device or as a complement
to a laptop?
Is the superior battery lifetime of a Palm a must have?
For what will I be using my PDA?
Is the PocketPC’s larger amount of functionality really needed or are there
alternatives?
Is there a possibility that my areas of needs might increase?
34
Page view 33
1 2 ... 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38

Comments to this Manuals

No comments